This will be the first outing on the table for my 6mm Russo-Japanese armies. The battle was a prelude to Liaoyang and was smallish in size with roughly 65K men per side. The Japanese 2nd Army, which consisted of 4 divisions plus some support units attacked through the hills with the objective of seizing the rail junction located at battles namesake town. Opposing them are two Siberian Infantry corps. Historically, the Russians gave a good account of themselves during this battle and withdrew in good order.
The battle will be played on a 6x4 table. It could have been bigger but I was worried about the camera being able to "see" the total field. The Russians are in the upper left half of the board and are defending the ling ridge in the middle.
Units are individual battalions.
I'll be using the WW1 ruleset "Great War Spearhead II" - why? I've played them a few times during Josh's epic Gallipoli games and like them. The employ an order concept for formations such as "Attack point X", "Move to Y", Defend Z". Once an order is set the details of how a unit moves or who it can target are pretty specific. Both of those concepts should lend themselves to remote play where players can give orders but cant really manipulate the bases in a precise manner.
All of the unit formations are color coded to make them easier for players to see. Video resolution will be an issue but that's also a form of fog of war - at least that's my current story.
To be honest, I am a little nervous about pulling this off. On the other hand, I really miss the Monday night game sessions at the club and just don't want to give into the negative side effects of enforced isolation without trying different options. Don't get me wrong - I fully support the concept of social distancing and know that we all are savings lives by complying. That said, if I can figure out a way to make them a little less dreary then that's a good thing too.
Lastly, I have checked the odds in 'Vegas and the overwhelming favorite for the outcome of tonight's game is:
Well, tonights game may be a disaster, but at least I know it can't be as bad as the slow US response to this Virus - thanks Donny for being my Mississippi.
!
(here in the US, Mississippi almost always ranks 50th in any measure of a positive aspect, so the other states that also rank lower are very appreciative that Mississippi always prevents them from being last.)
6 comments:
I will look forward to see how this goes, what is your actual set up? We have been using google hangouts but I find it not that good. I will be curious how it goes, does it allow multiple video inputs on your end.
I'm going to try ZOOM - I've got a personal paid account that should have the bandwidth. I suspect there will be a lot of teething problems
This looks terrific Miles. If you can, let me know when you're going live on Zoom as I'd like to see how you get on with this.
Excellent looking table mate.
Did you actually refight the battle? I find that Manchurian terrain is a beast to reproduce due to the hills.
Eric - we played it 2x via zoom. The first was a battalion level using Great War Spearhead II. That resulted in a Russian victory as GWS can be very punishing to attackers. The second time the scale was move up from battalion to regimental and I used an adaptation of the American Civil War ruleset "Alter of Freedom". That game was a very marginal Japanese victory but worked really well.
Post a Comment