Last Monday, I put on my second attempt with virtual gaming for the club. Overall it went better than the first attempt but that was more due to the smaller scale in terms of units and the rules.
I re-ran the same battle as last time (Tashinchiao from the Russo-Japanese War) but used Greg's Alter of Freedom rules, which move the scale up from Battalions to Regiments. That cut the number of unit bases in half and reduced the table top from 6x4 to 4x4 in size.
I made some changes to Alter of Freedom to include indirect artillery fire and machine guns but tried to keep the tinkering to a minimum. I may have failed but I did try...
The Japanese were able to stage an effective attack and the outcome of the game was still in doubt after we called a stop. I had four players (2 for each side) and we managed to get in 5 turns of a planned 12 during a 3 hour game session. Had we all been playing in person, I am convinced we would have gotten all the turns in. As for the outcome I think it was a toss up. One Japanese division was chewed up at the cost of 2.5 for the Russian formations. The game could have gone either way.
To me this is the biggest issue with staging a miniature game with lots of bases - it's just inefficient as one person me has to move all the pieces, roll the dice. It's also frustrating for players as they try to communicate where to position units for maximum effect and I often misunderstood their instructions and needed to constantly tinker with placement. There were some comical moments with exasperate players constantly telling me to move unit "over-there" or "where I'm pointing" only for me to remind them I cant see them.
Because I was so busy running the game, I couldn't take any pictures during play so have posted some end of gaming session pictures.
The Japanese (Greg and Josh) elected to attack the center- left flank of the Russians where they saw a gap in the defensive setup.
The attack pushed the Russians off the hill but reinforcements moved in to stem the Japanese tide. Both sides launched attacks and counterattacks - its was a swirling battle and was really fun to watch.
The Japanese left flank saw no action during the game but that may have changed had we gotten more than five turns in
Indirect artillery was an important factor in the game but it wasn't over-powering. I still need to tweak the rules to make it more streamlined its use in the game.
While Zoom is a good platform, we still experienced some issues with players have a hard time keeping the map camera they wanted pined (visible on the main screen). This could have been my fault as the host, Im just not sure. Given my general level of technical ineptitude, it probably was but there will always be issues with people using different types of bandwidth and devices.
So what have learned after putting on 2 "virtual games" and playing in two others.
1) Game Type Matters
Games with lots of bases and free form movement are very difficult to stage. It's exhausting for the GM and frustrating for the players as they just don't have the same control over unit placement. Games that have movement grids (squares or hexes) will be a lot easier to put on as unit placement options are limited. I'm hoping we can try "Rommel" or something like "Too the Strongest" in a future game to see if the gridded movement speeds things up.
Naval games where a player commands one or two ships also should work well - again you need rules that have gridded movement like "Fire as She Bears" (octagons) or "Hammering Iron" - ACW ironclads (hexes).
The next game I try to put on will likely be a Napoleonic naval game using Fire as She Bears.
2) Games with lots of Bases / and lots of different unit types/capabilities are hard to stage.
Camera resolution and your players bandwidth can limit the visibility of units and often results in players mistaking unit x of superior infantry for unit y of conscripts. I tried to manage this by color coding unit labels and keeping all the units of a formation the same quality but there still were points of confusion.
3) Multiple Cameras are a must and you need at least one "mobile" camera to zoom in on key spots. I had two cameras up and running - a mid-level logitech webcam and my I-phone on a tripod. The I-phone provided far superior image quality and about halfway through the game I started placing it on the table to zoom in and that worked well. One I-phone tip I learned is the camera on the back of the phone is superior to the one on the front.
4) Is it worth the trouble - Hell Yes. Despite all of the technical and gameplay issues being able to spend time with my gaming club is more than worth the effort to stage a game. Trying to keep some semblance of out Monday night traditions is important and something I'll continue to be working towards.
2 comments:
Interesting, we have played 6-7 tele-video games now. I think it would be impossible to play on a non grid mat. We have been playing Bag the Hun at 1/600 scale (WWII aircraft) on a hex mat which has been working well, I think my friend has at least 4 cameras going, one on himself, one overview, one dice tray and a close mobile iphone. He uses a video compiler called OBS (it is free and pretty easy to use) and we connect through zoom. I am trying to set up a 2 camera system on my side, 1 on me and 1 on my dice tray. but we are having problems with that. I think Rommel might also be a good choice. I will continue to watch your progress.
Excellent effort mate. I ran a game a couple of weeks ago using Zoom, and I concur with your findings... it's exhausting being the host, umpire & figure pusher at the same time!
Post a Comment